Political debates
and popular discussions of mass migration and refugee flows are increasingly dominated
by a language of ‘crisis’ and the measures adopted at European Union (EU) level are conceived
with an emergency-driven mind-set. This has led to the rise of unorthodox
institutional and policy developments as a pragmatic rather than a legal
response to address the formidable challenges posed by the mass movement of
refugees that is witnessed in Europe. [1]
Schengen once seemed like a hermetic system: sealed, internally fluid and
unbreakable. [2]
But that was before the conflict in Syria sent a veritable flood of displaced
people in search of a safe harbour into Europe. [3]